Re: Missing information on '-X' in section 26.3.6.1.

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: lukas(dot)langenegger(at)hexabit(dot)ch, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Missing information on '-X' in section 26.3.6.1.
Date: 2024-06-28 21:01:33
Message-ID: CAKFQuwaVPyjWe4KaA=QZNdOrQRBKkpCfyVpcJrHDObW6Ymo+kw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 12:41 PM David G. Johnston <
david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

>
> The attached patch moves this paragraph there. I distilled the paragraph
> down to its essence, but am open to being a bit more wordy, and consider
> more how this fits into the existing content of that page. I'm only really
> married to two things - mentioning the -X argument to pg_basebackup here is
> a bad idea and the content does not fit in the existing Tip area of
> continuous archiving section.
>
>
Created a new -hackers thread for my patch and added it to the commitfest
for July.

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAKFQuwaS6DtSde4TWpk133mfaQbgh8d%2BPkk0kDN%3D6jf6qEWbvQ%40mail.gmail.com

David J.

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Navrátil 2024-07-02 10:45:16 COALESCE documentation
Previous Message Jürgen Purtz 2024-06-25 15:25:13 Re: DocBook 5.2