From: | Navrátil, Ondřej <onavratil(at)monetplus(dot)cz> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | COALESCE documentation |
Date: | 2024-07-02 10:45:16 |
Message-ID: | CAEELDaqnn5GayihUUhnKLR1_fegb-_b2i+4_dP4U192uK7j9vw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Hello,
as per documentation
<https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/functions-conditional.html#FUNCTIONS-COALESCE-NVL-IFNULL>
> The COALESCE function returns the first of its arguments that is not
null. Null is returned only if all arguments are null.
This is not exactly true. In fact:
The COALESCE function returns the first of its arguments that *is
distinct* *from
*null. Null is returned only if all arguments *are not distinct from* null.
See my stack overflow question here
<https://stackoverflow.com/questions/78691097/postgres-null-on-composite-types>
.
Long story short
select coalesce((null, null), (10, 20)) as magic;
returns
magic -------
(,)
(1 row)
However, this is true:
select (null, null) is null;
--
*Ing. Ondřej Navrátil, Ph.D.*
IT Analytik
M +420 728 625 950
E onavratil(at)monetplus <onavratil(at)monetplus(dot)cz>.cz <onavratil(at)monetplus(dot)cz>
MONET+,a.s., Za Dvorem 505, 763 14 Zlín-Štípa
monetplus.com <https://www.monetplus.cz/> | linkedin
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/monetplus/> | facebo
<https://www.facebook.com/monetplus/>ok
<https://www.facebook.com/monetplus/>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | PG Doc comments form | 2024-07-02 20:00:26 | tutorial not accurate |
Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2024-06-28 21:01:33 | Re: Missing information on '-X' in section 26.3.6.1. |