| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Guyren Howe <guyren(at)gmail(dot)com>, raf <raf(at)raf(dot)org>, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, "Bysani, Ram" <rbysani(at)informatica(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Need help with clarification on stored procedure support in PostGreSQL database |
| Date: | 2021-03-09 23:54:10 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwaTDLvUT5LWMZ3TEW-apZTzpKdPxT_JPL6i3OEAkS47hQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 4:50 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I very strongly dislike the existing "The difference ..." wording,
> because it implies that that's the only difference, which is immediately
> belied by the rest.
Agreed!
> Would it be better
> to turn the para into a bulleted list, which we could introduce with
> "The key differences are:" ?
>
Indeed, reworking the rest of the paragraph around that introduction would
be much better.
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2021-03-09 23:57:05 | Re: unexpected character used as group separator by to_char |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2021-03-09 23:50:43 | Re: Need help with clarification on stored procedure support in PostGreSQL database |