Re: Need help with clarification on stored procedure support in PostGreSQL database

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Guyren Howe <guyren(at)gmail(dot)com>, raf <raf(at)raf(dot)org>, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, "Bysani, Ram" <rbysani(at)informatica(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Need help with clarification on stored procedure support in PostGreSQL database
Date: 2021-03-10 00:18:21
Message-ID: 2052104.1615335501@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"David G. Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 4:50 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Would it be better
>> to turn the para into a bulleted list, which we could introduce with
>> "The key differences are:" ?

> Indeed, reworking the rest of the paragraph around that introduction would
> be much better.

v2 attached.

regards, tom lane

Attachment Content-Type Size
improve-procedure-docs-2.patch text/x-diff 5.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martín Fernández 2021-03-10 01:56:15 Logical Replication, CPU load and Locking contention
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-03-09 23:57:05 Re: unexpected character used as group separator by to_char