From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Selina Tech <swucareer99(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: how plsql work on postgresql |
Date: | 2016-03-29 23:19:19 |
Message-ID: | CAKFQuwZny-CHcC+TOvqozBYmOcE+pS=cZ6SUj1p_ekCLEpUyOA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 3:57 PM, Selina Tech <swucareer99(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi, All
>
> I just start to learn plsql and plpgsql. There are a lot of
> comparison of pl/sql and pl/pgsql available online. I am wondering why
> plsql work well on Postgresql and how it work? Is the code converted to
> plpgsql code?
> If use postgresql database server, which one is better between
> plsql and pl/pgsql?
>
>
> Your feedback is highly appreciated.
>
>
It isn't "plsql", just "SQL" - but I might be losing something in the
translation. "pl/sql" is an Oracle thing that is indeed like "pl/pgsql" -
but "pl/sql" does not directly work, let alone well, on PostgreSQL...
Anyway, writing a function in "LANGUAGE sql" means you are limited to only
those things SQL can do. Using pl/pgsql gives you access to the power of
procedural logic among other things.
There is no "better" - but the general rule is if it can be done using SQL
then do so since you are likely to see better performance. When you need
to do something SQL cannot do then consider pl/pgsql.
David J.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Moore | 2016-03-30 15:23:38 | Re: how plsql work on postgresql |
Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2016-03-29 23:16:10 | Re: how plsql work on postgresql |