Re: 9.6 -> 10.0

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Darren Duncan <darren(at)darrenduncan(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Subject: Re: 9.6 -> 10.0
Date: 2016-05-10 01:30:58
Message-ID: CAKFQuwZd5JkYZgk0_JJKUxSQNOKeBqY4usGEumryPPz5qgt7cA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 6:06 PM, Darren Duncan <darren(at)darrenduncan(dot)net>
wrote:

> As such, assuming this proposal is adopted, I firmly support 10.0 for the
> next major.
>

​Two things...

Are we inclined to change this once we release Beta 1?

Does the person in charge of tagging the repo, i.e. Tom Lane, watch
-advocacy?

David J.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Darren Duncan 2016-05-10 01:38:59 Re: 9.6 -> 10.0
Previous Message Darren Duncan 2016-05-10 01:06:14 Re: 9.6 -> 10.0