Re: 9.6 -> 10.0

From: Darren Duncan <darren(at)darrenduncan(dot)net>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: 9.6 -> 10.0
Date: 2016-05-10 01:38:59
Message-ID: 57313BB3.4050409@darrenduncan.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On 2016-05-09 6:30 PM, David G. Johnston wrote:
> On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 6:06 PM, Darren Duncan <darren(at)darrenduncan(dot)net>wrote:
> As such, assuming this proposal is adopted, I firmly support 10.0 for the
> next major.
>
> ​Two things...
>
> Are we inclined to change this once we release Beta 1?
>
> Does the person in charge of tagging the repo, i.e. Tom Lane, watch -advocacy?

I would expect the version number to be mutable through the beta phase, and only
be locked down once the first release candidate is out. -- Darren Duncan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2016-05-10 01:49:20 Re: 9.6 -> 10.0
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2016-05-10 01:30:58 Re: 9.6 -> 10.0