Re: 9.6 parameters messing up my 9.2 pg_dump/pg_restore

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ken Tanzer <ken(dot)tanzer(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PG-General Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 9.6 parameters messing up my 9.2 pg_dump/pg_restore
Date: 2017-06-30 04:35:49
Message-ID: CAKFQuwZaujNb0XmstyM3cJhKtVom16x2YC97L9_F8-qUnpCafw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thursday, June 29, 2017, Ken Tanzer <ken(dot)tanzer(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I think it's great and impressive that you can install and run two
> versions simultaneously, but I have found a couple gotchas in the process.
> Maybe those are documented somewhere, but if so I haven't seen it. The
> issues I hit all had fairly easy solutions, but I'd humbly suggest that a
> "things to watch out for when running multiple versions of Postgres
> concurrently" might be a useful document.
>

You can always add something to the wiki. It's going to be distribution
specific which makes adding it to the docs less desirable.

David J.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Timokhin Maxim 2017-06-30 09:49:56 Re: duplicate key value violates unique constraint and duplicated records
Previous Message Ken Tanzer 2017-06-30 03:33:31 Re: 9.6 parameters messing up my 9.2 pg_dump/pg_restore