| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stuart Campbell <stuart(dot)campbell(at)ridewithvia(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Christophe Pettus <xof(at)thebuild(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Logical replication with temporary tables |
| Date: | 2024-07-03 01:19:51 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwYxezBvDNFpojam79cDvjzFoRCs+gAbGG+6v6Y9zs2zZw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tuesday, July 2, 2024, Stuart Campbell <stuart(dot)campbell(at)ridewithvia(dot)com>
wrote:
> This is a question for AWS. Community PostgreSQL doesn't have any of
>> these concepts, and this is all proprietary modifications to PostgreSQL by
>> Amazon.
>
>
> Maybe my question can be re-summarised as: do DDL operations on temporary
> tables necessarily have to be written to the WAL? Is there a way to avoid
> that?
>
>
Yes, and no. The tables those commands update are WAL-logged and that
status is all-or-nothing.
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Muhammad Ikram | 2024-07-03 03:18:27 | Re: Question on partman extension while relation exist |
| Previous Message | Christophe Pettus | 2024-07-03 01:19:12 | Re: Logical replication with temporary tables |