From: | Stuart Campbell <stuart(dot)campbell(at)ridewithvia(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Christophe Pettus <xof(at)thebuild(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Logical replication with temporary tables |
Date: | 2024-07-03 01:16:42 |
Message-ID: | CAAZ6Snxs+6si7gP5yrLNeGAzFgf9_mL1Di+C-_kOAW+96vs+xg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
>
> This is a question for AWS. Community PostgreSQL doesn't have any of
> these concepts, and this is all proprietary modifications to PostgreSQL by
> Amazon.
My understanding was that under the hood, AWS uses the logical replication
features that are present in community Postgres. If that's incorrect then
I'm sorry for the off-topic post.
Maybe my question can be re-summarised as: do DDL operations on temporary
tables necessarily have to be written to the WAL? Is there a way to avoid
that?
--
This communication and any attachments may contain confidential information
and are intended to be viewed only by the intended recipients. If you have
received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by
replying to the original message and then delete all copies of the email
from your systems.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christophe Pettus | 2024-07-03 01:19:12 | Re: Logical replication with temporary tables |
Previous Message | Christophe Pettus | 2024-07-03 00:49:57 | Re: Logical replication with temporary tables |