| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Oleksandr Shulgin <oleksandr(dot)shulgin(at)zalando(dot)de>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: psql's \d versus included-index-column feature |
| Date: | 2018-07-19 15:44:10 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwYrri_n5ONPer6Yy+VxhzPCADb77ewuOjGw6+z-mQc+aw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thursday, July 19, 2018, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> > Given that the documentation refers to included columns as "non-key
> > columns", it seems natural to me to name the \d output column "Key?" and
> > use "yes/no" as the values.
>
> WFM, anyone want to argue against?
>
Works for me as well.
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2018-07-19 17:28:36 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Give a better error message on invalid hostaddr option. |
| Previous Message | R, Siva | 2018-07-19 15:17:09 | Re: Bug in gin insert redo code path during re-compression of empty gin data leaf pages |