From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
Cc: | Robin Dupret <robin(dot)dupret(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Fix a tiny typo in the documentation |
Date: | 2025-01-22 13:38:34 |
Message-ID: | CAKFQuwYoGK8bZfztb0mw3QdukbDjQqQu4gPsPn3-9BZ5BUz8Bw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wednesday, January 22, 2025, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
> > On 22 Jan 2025, at 11:23, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
> >> On 22 Jan 2025, at 09:27, Robin Dupret <robin(dot)dupret(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> >> - special provision: you must write
> >> + special provision you must write:
> >
> > Nice catch, will fix.
>
> Re-reading it I think both placements of ':' are grammatically correct (not
> being a native speaker might trick me). The current one is, I'm sure,
> intentional but I agree it looks a bit odd to continue the sentence into a
> <programlisting> block and ending it without punctuation. For now I'm
> inclined
> to leave it though.
>
>
The colon does belong after provision, not write. If the colon is
bothersome rewrite to avoid it altogether. But the status quo works for me.
David J.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2025-01-22 13:52:19 | Re: Pgoutput not capturing the generated columns |
Previous Message | Hunaid Sohail | 2025-01-22 13:33:48 | Re: [PATCH] Add roman support for to_number function |