Re: Omission of "(or C)" in psql's "pset title" header

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: "pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Omission of "(or C)" in psql's "pset title" header
Date: 2015-08-27 16:16:22
Message-ID: CAKFQuwYk4gQWUH8k_TAm5LERmr_0r+XmGwYqC5NKtbSUSWGNgg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Thursday, August 27, 2015, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 11:50:53AM -0400, David G. Johnston wrote:
> > ​Yes, I read that as "\pset tuples_only" and "\t" are alternate forms of
> the
> > same thing
> > ​ and thought that "\pset title" and "\C" should be documented
> similarly.
> > Making "\pset C <label>" work doesn't seem like an improvement.
>
> Well, making \pset C is at least consistent. We can't say "or C"
> without it.
>
>
Agreed.

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2015-08-31 12:08:15 Re: small fix for pgprewarm.sgml
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2015-08-27 16:06:29 Re: Omission of "(or C)" in psql's "pset title" header