Re: Omission of "(or C)" in psql's "pset title" header

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Omission of "(or C)" in psql's "pset title" header
Date: 2015-08-27 16:06:29
Message-ID: 20150827160629.GK29674@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 11:50:53AM -0400, David G. Johnston wrote:
> ​Yes, I read that as "\pset tuples_only" and "\t" are alternate forms of the
> same thing
> ​ and thought that "\pset title" and "\C" should be documented similarly. 
> Making "\pset C <label>" work doesn't seem like an improvement.

Well, making \pset C is at least consistent. We can't say "or C"
without it.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2015-08-27 16:16:22 Re: Omission of "(or C)" in psql's "pset title" header
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2015-08-27 15:50:53 Re: Omission of "(or C)" in psql's "pset title" header