Re: UUID v7

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Sergey Prokhorenko <sergeyprokhorenko(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Andrew Alsup <bluesbreaker(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Przemysław Sztoch <przemyslaw(at)sztoch(dot)pl>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, Pgsql-Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Mat Arye <mat(at)timescaledb(dot)com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nikolay Samokhvalov <samokhvalov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stepan Neretin <sncfmgg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: UUID v7
Date: 2025-02-18 07:03:26
Message-ID: CAKFQuwYiBReULWsSUcZ=-PMWgoejTN7G2DaRDqr4vNtM6EzzLg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Monday, February 17, 2025, Sergey Prokhorenko <
sergeyprokhorenko(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)au> wrote:

> This means exactly the opposite of what you wrote. There is a big
> difference between UUID versions and data types. The properties of
> identifiers strongly depend on the implementation of generating function. Don't
> give advice without studying the subject area.
>

I learn by doing and will make mistakes. In this case being imprecise and
not making my point with concrete examples.

But can we please stop this thread-jacking and give these two patches
proper homes? This thread should have died on the 12th with the “both
patches pushed” message, IMHO.

David J.

In response to

  • Re: UUID v7 at 2025-02-17 20:03:30 from David G. Johnston

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Naylor 2025-02-18 07:16:23 Re: Sort functions with specialized comparators
Previous Message Sergey Belyashov 2025-02-18 06:56:56 Re: BUG #18815: Logical replication worker Segmentation fault