| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Cc: | splarv(at)ya(dot)ru, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 31.7.1. Initial Snapshot |
| Date: | 2023-10-11 16:45:57 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwYfgDbWZkX3dUhY37fXFfxsM8rf+OoB2P6imn4Mdcq7QA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 9:41 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
wrote:
> Maybe a fix for this would be to style chapter TOCs in some way that
> makes it clear that they are TOCs -- for example, add a (subtly) visible
> bounding box, or something. Or maybe if a chapter has a single section,
> just do not print the TOC at all. I have no idea how to implement such
> a fix, or whether it'd be really acceptable after all.
>
Or move 4 paragraphs of introductory material into its own section so that
there are two sections and a brief sentence for an intro.
I don't see a special case for a single section to be a productive use of
time. Improved formatting overall for the chapter ToC has merit.
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2023-10-11 17:19:44 | Re: 31.7.1. Initial Snapshot |
| Previous Message | Laurenz Albe | 2023-10-11 16:43:45 | Re: Wrong article SET AUTOCOMMIT |