| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | splarv(at)ya(dot)ru, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 31.7.1. Initial Snapshot |
| Date: | 2023-10-11 17:19:44 |
| Message-ID: | 202310111719.h5b6ihmnpyku@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On 2023-Oct-11, David G. Johnston wrote:
> Or move 4 paragraphs of introductory material into its own section so that
> there are two sections and a brief sentence for an intro.
We have lots of other places where this (single-entry TOCs) happens. I
don't think we want to add spurious <section> tags in all those places
is going to be a good idea.
> I don't see a special case for a single section to be a productive use of
> time.
Well, it's the only case where it's not obvious what is going on, but I
agree it's not a great fix -- maybe we have some place where the
introductory material is very long and the first section is several
pagefuls below, and not having a TOC in that case wouldn't be great.
> Improved formatting overall for the chapter ToC has merit.
Great ...
--
Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Crear es tan difícil como ser libre" (Elsa Triolet)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2023-10-11 17:57:32 | Re: 31.7.1. Initial Snapshot |
| Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2023-10-11 16:45:57 | Re: 31.7.1. Initial Snapshot |