| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Igal (at) Lucee(dot)org" <igal(at)lucee(dot)org> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Finally upgrading to 9.6! |
| Date: | 2017-10-18 15:46:29 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwYVfDDKRXtFKF_rbh3n=XxDmtOD56VvB2Fwt4msgTgyGQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 8:16 AM, Igal @ Lucee.org <igal(at)lucee(dot)org> wrote:
> On 10/18/2017 7:45 AM, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> On 10/18/2017 09:34 AM, Igal @ Lucee.org wrote:
>
> A bit off-topic here, but why upgrade to 9.6 when you can upgrade to
> 10.0?
>
>
> There's no way we're going to put an x.0.0 version into production.
>
>
> Then think of it as 9.7.0 but with an easier name to pronounce ;)
>
The OP likely intended to say "x.0" version; which a "[9.7].0" version is
just the same as a [10].0 version
The contributors do an excellent job but the reality of this community is
that a critical mass of people do not start seriously testing and using a
new version until it is officially released. The first couple of bug-fix
releases are thus, unfortunately, likely to be non-trivial as the masses
flex the system at scales and using workloads that were not known or
available to the developers. Its a balancing act for most and falling on
the side of waiting for a few point releases before promoting to production
is, I suspect, common.
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ron Johnson | 2017-10-18 15:49:41 | Re: Finally upgrading to 9.6! |
| Previous Message | Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul) | 2017-10-18 15:38:35 | Re: Problems with the time in data type timestamp without time zone |