| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | julien(dot)champalbert(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Full Text Search |
| Date: | 2023-10-29 21:02:50 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwYQL=5GEvp+FBO2tawV_aYZNFDqPrj54k6LwD-5fGP+Pw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Sun, Oct 29, 2023, 13:58 PG Doc comments form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org>
wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/textsearch-limitations.html
> Description:
>
> Hello,
>
> In the FTS/Limitations part of the documentation, it says :
>
> "Another example — the PostgreSQL mailing list archives contained 910,989
> unique words with 57,491,343 lexemes in 461,020 messages."
>
> How could the number of lexemes be greater than unique words ?
>
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/textsearch-parsers.html
Note the part with the hyphenated word example.
David J.
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Julien Champalbert | 2023-10-30 09:00:36 | Re: Full Text Search |
| Previous Message | PG Doc comments form | 2023-10-29 11:22:08 | Full Text Search |