| From: | Julien Champalbert <julien(dot)champalbert(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Full Text Search |
| Date: | 2023-10-30 09:00:36 |
| Message-ID: | 7FEBE653-7BCA-418F-8960-73430C35E5DB@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Thank you David for your response, it makes sense now.
Julien
> Le 29 oct. 2023 à 22:02, David G. Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> a écrit :
>
> On Sun, Oct 29, 2023, 13:58 PG Doc comments form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org <mailto:noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org>> wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/textsearch-limitations.html <https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/textsearch-limitations.html>
> Description:
>
> Hello,
>
> In the FTS/Limitations part of the documentation, it says :
>
> "Another example — the PostgreSQL mailing list archives contained 910,989
> unique words with 57,491,343 lexemes in 461,020 messages."
>
> How could the number of lexemes be greater than unique words ?
>
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/textsearch-parsers.html <https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/textsearch-parsers.html>
>
> Note the part with the hyphenated word example.
>
> David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Westermann (DWE) | 2023-10-30 13:15:18 | Missing word? https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/continuous-archiving.html#BACKUP-ARCHIVING-WAL |
| Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2023-10-29 21:02:50 | Re: Full Text Search |