Re: work_mem

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: SASIKUMAR Devaraj <sashikumard(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: "Campbell, Lance" <lance(at)illinois(dot)edu>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, MichaelDBA <michaeldba(at)sqlexec(dot)com>, "holger(at)jakobs(dot)com" <holger(at)jakobs(dot)com>, "pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: work_mem
Date: 2021-04-03 05:44:13
Message-ID: CAKFQuwY3vS9eegPQqu+c5JD1CZw1x2wSxTkG8bTHPVU=PxCmAA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On Friday, April 2, 2021, SASIKUMAR Devaraj <sashikumard(at)yahoo(dot)com> wrote:

>
> Case 1:
> work_mem=4m
> Total Sessions connected=100
> Total=400M
>
> Or Case 2
> work_mem=4m
> Total Sort operations at DB now=50
> Total work_mem=200M
>
> Please clarify at high level whether Case 1 is true or Case 2 is true?
>

Case 2

David J.

In response to

  • Re: work_mem at 2021-04-03 05:23:56 from SASIKUMAR Devaraj

Responses

  • Re: work_mem at 2021-04-03 06:15:37 from SASIKUMAR Devaraj

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message SASIKUMAR Devaraj 2021-04-03 06:15:37 Re: work_mem
Previous Message SASIKUMAR Devaraj 2021-04-03 05:23:56 Re: work_mem