Re: work_mem

From: SASIKUMAR Devaraj <sashikumard(at)yahoo(dot)com>
To: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Campbell, Lance" <lance(at)illinois(dot)edu>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, MichaelDBA <michaeldba(at)sqlexec(dot)com>, "holger(at)jakobs(dot)com" <holger(at)jakobs(dot)com>, "pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: work_mem
Date: 2021-04-03 06:15:37
Message-ID: 1083971116.2431044.1617430537771@mail.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Excellent. Thank you very much for the clarification. Much Appreciated.
Regards
Sasi
On Saturday, 3 April, 2021, 11:14:36 am IST, David G. Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:


On Friday, April 2, 2021, SASIKUMAR Devaraj <sashikumard(at)yahoo(dot)com> wrote:


Case 1: 
work_mem=4mTotal Sessions connected=100Total=400M 
Or Case 2work_mem=4mTotal Sort operations at DB now=50Total work_mem=200M
Please clarify at high level whether Case 1 is true or Case 2 is true?

Case 2
David J.

In response to

  • Re: work_mem at 2021-04-03 05:44:13 from David G. Johnston

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Katherine Mcmillan 2021-04-03 17:32:33 Re: Thank you!
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2021-04-03 05:44:13 Re: work_mem