Re: Sample rate added to pg_stat_statements

From: Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
Cc: Ilia Evdokimov <ilya(dot)evdokimov(at)tantorlabs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Sample rate added to pg_stat_statements
Date: 2024-11-19 14:39:21
Message-ID: CAKAnmmLD8C-Y6CVF74Ccup8h9YpzBYzSvWWRG_Qf8+5YEMh4-g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 7:12 AM Andrey M. Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
wrote:

> +1 for the idea. I heard a lot of complaints about that pgss is costly.
> Most of them were using it wrong though.

I'm curious what "using it wrong" means exactly?

Oh, and a +1 in general to the patch, OP, although it would also be nice to
start finding the bottlenecks that cause such performance issues.

Cheers,
Greg

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dmitry Dolgov 2024-11-19 14:45:19 Re: ALTER TABLE uses a bistate but not for toast tables
Previous Message Ilia Evdokimov 2024-11-19 14:23:01 Re: Sample rate added to pg_stat_statements