Re: Sample rate added to pg_stat_statements

From: "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
To: Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ilia Evdokimov <ilya(dot)evdokimov(at)tantorlabs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Sample rate added to pg_stat_statements
Date: 2024-11-21 13:55:16
Message-ID: 11FEF49E-80BB-4B74-996F-7FF14E63AF2D@yandex-team.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 19 Nov 2024, at 17:39, Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I'm curious what "using it wrong" means exactly?

Here's an example. pgSCV is querying pgss for every database separately every minute. It makes sense for the project. But when you have ~1000 databases, you have a lot of traffic to pgss alone. Even if you have only one active database, because all pgss results must be put into tuplestore before filtering. See [0] for details.

Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

[0] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/1AEEB240-9B68-44D5-8A29-8F9FDB22C801%40yandex-team.ru

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message jian he 2024-11-21 13:58:03 Re: Proposal to use JSON for Postgres Parser format
Previous Message Tom Lane 2024-11-21 13:52:46 Re: Planner picks n² query plan when available