Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs

From: Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jacob Burroughs <jburroughs(at)instructure(dot)com>, Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, hlinnaka <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Subject: Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs
Date: 2024-06-06 03:49:06
Message-ID: CAKAnmmK6Rif2hPU7ves9punz-9xXbK0SVyziovoU6RsAGk8Crg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 9:03 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> It's a funny use of "max" and "min", because the max is really what we're
> trying to do and the min is what we end
> up with, and those terms don't necessarily bring those ideas to mind.

requested_protocol_version and minimum_protocol_version?

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2024-06-06 03:52:26 Re: Logical Replication of sequences
Previous Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2024-06-06 03:38:48 Re: Better error message when --single is not the first arg to postgres executable