Re: [Pgbuildfarm-members] PG buildfarm coverage needed for new uuid code

From: Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgbuildfarm-members(at)lists(dot)pgfoundry(dot)org
Subject: Re: [Pgbuildfarm-members] PG buildfarm coverage needed for new uuid code
Date: 2014-05-28 02:07:45
Message-ID: CAK3UJRHO_ZiZvG6u7Yp3ob7_pr4hAwNa0f=6vZ9xKmG-UbLR=Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: buildfarm-members

On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Could I entreat buildfarm owners to enable testing of contrib/uuid-ossp
> if their machines have suitable UUID libraries?

FWIW, I've rigged shearwater to build HEAD --with-uuid=e2fs with your
suggested build-farm.conf tweak, and it seems happy.

http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=shearwater&dt=2014-05-28%2001%3A45%3A33

Josh

In response to

Browse buildfarm-members by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2014-05-28 18:34:18 Re: Bison 3.0 updates
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-05-28 01:52:52 Re: [Pgbuildfarm-members] PG buildfarm coverage needed for new uuid code