From: | Dermot <paikkos(at)googlemail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Sponsored development |
Date: | 2011-09-12 21:33:16 |
Message-ID: | CAK+UtvJziXDqE44xP8qoMZ7-rx-d7YmgF3e5WJg+Qb0d9YVjUQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
First off, I hope this approach is not breaking protocol.
I have seen this feature on the todo list:
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo#Referential_Integrity
It's my understanding that this will allow FK constraints on array
elements, if I'm wrong, please stop me now....
If I've assumed correctly, the company I work for would like to offer
an incentive to progress the work. As we're a tax registered company,
we'd need a invoice or receipt. I do not know if there is an existing
mechanism for such as arrangement. We thought payment should be
released once the feature was available in a stable release. The
amount we'd like to offer is £500 (pounds sterling).
Again, I hope this email does not offend the etiquette of the list and
I'd like to keep the discussion on-list initially if possible.
Thank you,
Dermot.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-09-12 22:48:13 | Re: Thinking about inventing MemoryContextSetParent |
Previous Message | Marti Raudsepp | 2011-09-12 21:27:48 | Re: [WIP] Caching constant stable expressions per execution |