From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dermot <paikkos(at)googlemail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Sponsored development |
Date: | 2011-09-13 08:36:26 |
Message-ID: | CA+U5nMLiqO6RostBEjw7NXnwxUBjT+iZ2AnNxduPrixkGhd+4Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Dermot <paikkos(at)googlemail(dot)com> wrote:
> First off, I hope this approach is not breaking protocol.
>
> I have seen this feature on the todo list:
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo#Referential_Integrity
>
> It's my understanding that this will allow FK constraints on array
> elements, if I'm wrong, please stop me now....
>
> If I've assumed correctly, the company I work for would like to offer
> an incentive to progress the work. As we're a tax registered company,
> we'd need a invoice or receipt. I do not know if there is an existing
> mechanism for such as arrangement. We thought payment should be
> released once the feature was available in a stable release. The
> amount we'd like to offer is £500 (pounds sterling).
>
> Again, I hope this email does not offend the etiquette of the list and
> I'd like to keep the discussion on-list initially if possible.
Inward investment into PostgreSQL is important, so I'd like to set an
example here by accepting your offer to implement FKs on arrays.
It's also important since it indicates what users really want.
The sum offered is low, but the proactivity and graciousness of your
offer deserves to be rewarded.
Thanks. We'll get that into 9.2 for you.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2011-09-13 08:41:36 | Re: Range Types |
Previous Message | Joe Banafato | 2011-09-13 08:18:48 | Rough impl of IGNORE NULLS for window functions |