From: | Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Okano, Naoki" <okano(dot)naoki(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
Cc: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_recvlogical --endpos |
Date: | 2016-12-02 03:01:25 |
Message-ID: | CAJrrPGcrs=OO398V2cMWieQPvNOyBNSO8QSQrshac5oHR504Ng@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Okano, Naoki <okano(dot)naoki(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 10:34 AM Craig Ringer wrote:
> >On 30 November 2016 at 09:18, Okano, Naoki <okano(dot)naoki(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On November 29, 2016 at 5:03 PM Craig Ringer wrote:
> >>> Would it be better rephrased as "--endpos can only be used with
> --start" ?
> >> OK. I think this phrase is better than the previous phrase.
> >>
> >>>> The patch should allow --endpos to work with --create-slot.
> >>>
> >>> How? It doesn't make sense with --create-slot .
> >> This patch is updated to incorporate Alvaro's changes shown below,
> isn't it?
> >> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20160503180658.
> GA59498%40alvherre.pgsql
> >> I thought that the consent in community was taken with this
> specification...
> >>> I could not find any mention that it did not make sense with
> --create-slot.
>
> > What would --endpos with --create-slot do?
>
> Sorry, I was misunderstanding. you are right.
> I have noticed that --endpos doesn't make sense unless it is with --start.
> I checked --endpos works with --create-slot and --start.
> So, there is no problem with this patch.
>
>
Moved to next CF with "needs review" state.
Regards,
Hari Babu
Fujitsu Australia
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Haribabu Kommi | 2016-12-02 03:04:44 | Re: Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM) |
Previous Message | xu jian | 2016-12-02 02:54:27 | 答复: [HACKERS] Re: [HACKERS] 答复: [HACKERS] postgres 1 个(共 2 个) can pg 9.6 vacuum freeze skip page on index? |