From: | Rajesh Kumar <rajeshkumar(dot)dba09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tomek <tomekphotos(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Table health |
Date: | 2023-10-18 13:37:45 |
Message-ID: | CAJk5AtZ8NuNqhb1QU6pdJEx7u4cF2uP529AbbTaBc-Ae2kB5eA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
There is no problem with vaccum, i used to do it periodically...apart from
vaccum i am asking things like table bloat, index bloat, duplicate index
removal, unused index removal, cache hit ratio for table, cache hit ratio
for index, .......what else?
Also, i saw cache hit ratio is only 2% for one big table and all other
tables are around 9%. Is that a problem?
On Wed, 18 Oct, 2023, 6:10 PM Tomek, <tomekphotos(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> As a preliminary and often but good enough test, I recommend VACUUM FREEZE
> VERBOSE ...
> In 95% of cases such simple check will satisfy your needs .
> Of course amcheck tool is much better but it is an extension.
>
> wt., 17 paź 2023 o 19:59 Rajesh Kumar <rajeshkumar(dot)dba09(at)gmail(dot)com>
> napisał(a):
>
>> I have been asked to check table health of specific big table.
>>
>> What are list of things I have to check?
>>
>
>
> --
> --
> Polecam moje mojego autorstwa na FB
> <https://www.facebook.com/tomasz.main/photos_albums>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tomek | 2023-10-18 14:02:13 | Re: Table health |
Previous Message | Tomek | 2023-10-18 12:40:36 | Re: Table health |