From: | Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Maxim Orlov <m(dot)orlov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Pengchengliu <pengchengliu(at)tju(dot)edu(dot)cn>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Parallel scan with SubTransGetTopmostTransaction assert coredump |
Date: | 2021-08-09 04:18:05 |
Message-ID: | CAJcOf-ciUesgk2MN67S1F=Yr9Jbx5arGucLUO4wOU4e2Pj-rQQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 12:03 PM Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
As the current v7 patch doesn't fix the coredump issue and also the
cfbot is now failing (as one of the regression tests fails) I'm
reinstating my v2/v5 patch (as v8) as the current best solution to
this issue.
So far I haven't found a test case (e.g. isolation level) that breaks
the patch. Pavel did encounter an error (but no crash) when testing
the patch with SERIALIZABLE, but he found that this error occurred
anyway without the patch.
Regards,
Greg Nancarrow
Fujitsu Australia
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v8-0001-Fix-parallel-worker-failed-assertion-and-coredump.patch | application/octet-stream | 6.4 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Rowley | 2021-08-09 04:53:02 | Re: Update maintenance_work_mem/autovacuum_work_mem to reflect the 1GB limitation with VACUUM |
Previous Message | Peter Smith | 2021-08-09 04:01:40 | Re: Small documentation improvement for ALTER SUBSCRIPTION |