Re: Update maintenance_work_mem/autovacuum_work_mem to reflect the 1GB limitation with VACUUM

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: Martín Marqués <martin(dot)marques(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Update maintenance_work_mem/autovacuum_work_mem to reflect the 1GB limitation with VACUUM
Date: 2021-08-09 04:53:02
Message-ID: CAApHDvrmUknaHZtXD2aV48garPGqHsnLJ6Q2qLS7F1bt37ZaiA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 9 Aug 2021 at 14:44, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I plan to push this and backpatch to 9.6 shortly unless there are any
> better ideas.

I pushed this patch. I've now marked the entry in the commitfest app
as committed too.

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message PG Doc comments form 2021-08-09 12:53:00 incorrect information in documentation
Previous Message David Rowley 2021-08-09 02:44:13 Re: Update maintenance_work_mem/autovacuum_work_mem to reflect the 1GB limitation with VACUUM

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2021-08-09 04:53:03 Re: Added schema level support for publication.
Previous Message Greg Nancarrow 2021-08-09 04:18:05 Re: Parallel scan with SubTransGetTopmostTransaction assert coredump