Re: Proper relational database?

From: Manuel Gómez <targen(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Paul Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proper relational database?
Date: 2016-04-22 23:15:37
Message-ID: CAJWnFaMxaD_Dh1Ld84quT3A1JzEs=rJXLhRmyEfgQW+ido5Xsg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Paul Jungwirth
<pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com> wrote:
> I'm surprised no one yet has mentioned Tutorial D by C. J. Date. His book
> _Database in Depth_ is pretty much an extended argument for how superior it
> is to SQL. RelDB is apparently an open source implementation of it, and D4
> is a commercial one. That's about all I know in terms of practically using
> it for something. But Date & Tutorial D seems like a good place to start if
> SQL isn't relational enough for you. The book I mentioned is short and easy
> to read.

This is a relevant project: https://github.com/agentm/project-m36

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message david 2016-04-23 01:52:15 Re: Proper relational database?
Previous Message John R Pierce 2016-04-22 22:21:17 Re: Fwd: Process scheduling in postgres