Re: Proper relational database?

From: Paul Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proper relational database?
Date: 2016-04-22 19:37:38
Message-ID: 571A7D82.6060803@illuminatedcomputing.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 04/21/2016 01:36 PM, Guyren Howe wrote:
> Anyone familiar with the issue would have to say that the tech world
> would be a significantly better place if IBM had developed a real
> relational database with an elegant query language

I'm surprised no one yet has mentioned Tutorial D by C. J. Date. His
book _Database in Depth_ is pretty much an extended argument for how
superior it is to SQL. RelDB is apparently an open source implementation
of it, and D4 is a commercial one. That's about all I know in terms of
practically using it for something. But Date & Tutorial D seems like a
good place to start if SQL isn't relational enough for you. The book I
mentioned is short and easy to read.

Paul

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2016-04-22 19:40:27 Re: Proper relational database?
Previous Message Raymond Brinzer 2016-04-22 19:25:56 Re: Proper relational database?