Re: Question about behavior of deletes with REPLICA IDENTITY NOTHING

From: Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net>
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Question about behavior of deletes with REPLICA IDENTITY NOTHING
Date: 2025-01-11 13:58:21
Message-ID: CAJSLCQ2UeMmtgD0P14NGwu_5HxJ4Z3bwqurrWVyuN3BWy+s+Pw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 10:41 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi Robert.
>
> The content and rendering of patch v2 LGTM.
>
> Should the word wrapping within the file
> doc/src/sgml/logical-replication.sgml be tidied up though?
>

Definitely couldn't hurt; Updated patch cleans that up a bit and
tweaks the link to alter table replica status.

Robert Treat
https://xzilla.net

Attachment Content-Type Size
v3-0001-Expand-and-clarify-Replica-Identity-information.patch application/octet-stream 6.2 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2025-01-11 14:01:54 Re: why there is not VACUUM FULL CONCURRENTLY?
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2025-01-11 12:51:23 Re: Include patch id in commitfest page