Re: Question about behavior of deletes with REPLICA IDENTITY NOTHING

From: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Question about behavior of deletes with REPLICA IDENTITY NOTHING
Date: 2025-01-13 01:11:34
Message-ID: CAHut+PuS-U7f-6T-1JnG=3hBA8zp0W-f+s2yoWGZpeAak5HPtw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 12:58 AM Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 10:41 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Robert.
> >
> > The content and rendering of patch v2 LGTM.
> >
> > Should the word wrapping within the file
> > doc/src/sgml/logical-replication.sgml be tidied up though?
> >
>
> Definitely couldn't hurt; Updated patch cleans that up a bit and
> tweaks the link to alter table replica status.
>

+1 for that link change.

Patch v3 LGTM.

======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Smith 2025-01-13 01:37:25 Re: pg_createsubscriber TAP test wrapping makes command options hard to read.
Previous Message Alexander Korotkov 2025-01-13 01:06:42 Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes