Re: Remove fsync ON/OFF as a visible option?

From: Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Remove fsync ON/OFF as a visible option?
Date: 2015-03-21 20:31:19
Message-ID: CAJKUy5hF43AC5YicSQ3DhLX1QcwDaNxaUum9EogZoL6HKPpZ+A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 03/20/2015 11:28 PM, Jaime Casanova wrote:
>>
>>
>
>> I fought to remove fsync before so i understand JD concerns. and yes,
>> i have seen fsync=off in the field too...
>>
>> what about not removing it but not showing it in postgresql.conf? as a
>> side note, i wonder why trace_sort is not in postgresql.conf...
>
>
> That is the original proposal. I am not suggesting that it not be an option.
> I am suggesting that it is not in postgresql.conf by default.
>
>

you're right, i misunderstood... anyway i don't feel there's a need to
avoid people putting in there...
just don't ship with the guc in there, if someone puts it by himself
that's completely another thing

--
Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com
Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte 24x7 y capacitación

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Миша Тюрин 2015-03-21 20:49:34 Re[2]: [HACKERS] Remove fsync ON/OFF as a visible option?
Previous Message Gavin Flower 2015-03-21 19:56:18 Re: Remove fsync ON/OFF as a visible option?