| From: | Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi> |
| Subject: | Re: Syntax for partitioning |
| Date: | 2011-11-09 14:35:28 |
| Message-ID: | CAJKUy5g-d_UiOUiLCp-GmyX6DVxAbiSNPopxJh4=2M6N5G0-yw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 8:26 AM, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
>
> So will this be revived any time soon? Were there any subsequent
> proposals which were posted?
>
there was an updated patch, you can find in this thread:
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/20100114181323.9A33.52131E4D@oss.ntt.co.jp
not sure what happens after that.
--
Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com
Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte 24x7 y capacitación
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nikhil Sontakke | 2011-11-09 14:51:58 | Re: Concurrent CREATE TABLE/DROP SCHEMA leaves inconsistent leftovers |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-11-09 14:21:22 | Re: a modest improvement to get_object_address() |