Re: Syntax for partitioning

From: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
To: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi>
Subject: Re: Syntax for partitioning
Date: 2011-11-09 13:26:31
Message-ID: CAA-aLv63cdsX=8G9KgpYxeaJKyqb8BL8t-shhSHx1A-8X36+BQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 15 December 2009 02:31, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 09:00 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 11:54 +0900, Itagaki Takahiro wrote:
>>> > Here is an update partitioning syntax patch.
>>> >
>>> > A bug reported by Marko is fixed.
>>>
>>> I will review and eventually commit this, if appropriate, though it is
>>> 3rd in my queue and will probably not be done for at least 2 weeks,
>>> possibly 4 weeks.
>>
>> I'll have to go back on this unfortunately, sorry about that.
>>
>
> the next patch for this will arrive in the next commitfest so maybe
> you have more time then

So will this be revived any time soon? Were there any subsequent
proposals which were posted?

--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Cédric Villemain 2011-11-09 13:37:53 Re: a modest improvement to get_object_address()
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2011-11-09 13:25:46 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: In COPY, insert tuples to the heap in batches.