Re: A minor adjustment to get_cheapest_path_for_pathkeys

From: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: A minor adjustment to get_cheapest_path_for_pathkeys
Date: 2023-09-05 16:01:09
Message-ID: CAJ7c6TOwHA6ySJWa==9faZfShCRcjrjpQaSLSD8-_nTrQuV0rw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Robert,

> I don't think that's the correct conclusion. You said here that you
> didn't think the patch was valuable. Then you said the same thing over
> there. You agreeing with yourself is not a consensus.

The word "consensus" was a poor choice for sure. The fact that I
suggested to reject the patch and nobody objected straight away is not
a consensus.

> I think this patch is a good idea and should be committed.

No problem, changing status back to "Needs review".

--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Aleksander Alekseev 2023-09-05 16:05:14 Re: A minor adjustment to get_cheapest_path_for_pathkeys
Previous Message Yugo NAGATA 2023-09-05 15:45:24 Re: Make psql's qeury canceling test simple by using signal() routine of IPC::Run