Re: A minor adjustment to get_cheapest_path_for_pathkeys

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>
Cc: Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A minor adjustment to get_cheapest_path_for_pathkeys
Date: 2023-09-05 15:09:54
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYbX1B-DYqTLUvhRresXOa7t_65BgnwFqSVwqPpM2Twnw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Sep 4, 2023 at 10:17 AM Aleksander Alekseev
<aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com> wrote:
> During the triage of the patches submitted for the September CF a
> consensus was reached [1] to mark this patch as Rejected.

I don't think that's the correct conclusion. You said here that you
didn't think the patch was valuable. Then you said the same thing over
there. You agreeing with yourself is not a consensus.

I think this patch is a good idea and should be committed.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2023-09-05 15:20:44 Re: SLRUs in the main buffer pool - Page Header definitions
Previous Message jacktby jacktby 2023-09-05 15:09:35 Re: How to add a new pg oid?