From: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | KONDO Mitsumasa <kondo(dot)mitsumasa(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Who is pgFoundery administrator? |
Date: | 2013-10-21 17:35:33 |
Message-ID: | CAHyXU0zxuDr6jaP5Ejfq6dCBfqH_950ZsScvkWae61R1d+zDvw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 5:27 AM, KONDO Mitsumasa
<kondo(dot)mitsumasa(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> (2013/10/02 18:57), Michael Paquier wrote:
>>
>> <kondo(dot)mitsumasa(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>>>
>>> Who is pgFoundery administrator or board member now? I would like to send
>>> e-mail
>>> them. At least, it does not have information and support page in
>>> pgFoundery homepage.
>>
>> Why don't you consider github as a potential solution?
>
> It is because github is too various software to search PostgreSQL good
> tools:-( In contrast, pgfoundry is easy to search good tools for
> PostgreSQL:-) When we'd like to search PG good tools in google, it can
> difficult to search our tools. Because we don't do keyword search
> optimizations.
>
> I hope pgfoundry will be more robust and popular. It has been still needed.
Marc was able to square my issue away -- everything seems to be good now...
merlin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2013-10-21 17:44:04 | Re: Bug? Function with side effects not evaluated in CTE |
Previous Message | Moshe Jacobson | 2013-10-21 16:43:21 | Re: Bug? Function with side effects not evaluated in CTE |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Boszormenyi Zoltan | 2013-10-21 17:39:08 | Re: Commitfest II CLosed |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2013-10-21 17:33:38 | Re: Commitfest II CLosed |