Re: [GENERAL] How Many PG_Locks are considered too many

From: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: John Scalia <jayknowsunix(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Renato Oliveira <Renato(dot)Oliveira(at)cantabcapital(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Forums postgresql <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] How Many PG_Locks are considered too many
Date: 2015-07-30 19:05:38
Message-ID: CAHyXU0ytTO0CmR=-1nrzm=y9zwvfp_Q28-t06RHtJL8VQQTnsw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-general

On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 9:19 AM, John Scalia <jayknowsunix(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Seconding Peter on this one; it's a lot more important should one of those
> locks be hanging around, say for hours or days, not how many have come and
> gone.

Also, it's good to focus on *ungranted* locks. Typically the only
time I care about granted locks is to find out which process is
keeping my other process getting its lock granted.

merlin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-07-30 19:07:52 Re: Autovacuum behavior
Previous Message John Scalia 2015-07-30 19:04:02 Re: Autovacuum behavior

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alban Hertroys 2015-07-30 20:09:09 Re: Question about copy from with timestamp format
Previous Message Spiros Ioannou 2015-07-30 19:02:47 Re: Lots of stuck queries after upgrade to 9.4