From: | Renato Oliveira <Renato(dot)Oliveira(at)cantabcapital(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | John Scalia <jayknowsunix(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Forums postgresql <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] How Many PG_Locks are considered too many |
Date: | 2015-07-31 06:34:34 |
Message-ID: | 11A711B8-3A31-4F21-BA53-9854A320F338@cantabcapital.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-general |
Thank you appreciated
Sent from my iPhone
> On 30 Jul 2015, at 20:05, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 9:19 AM, John Scalia <jayknowsunix(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Seconding Peter on this one; it's a lot more important should one of those
>> locks be hanging around, say for hours or days, not how many have come and
>> gone.
>
> Also, it's good to focus on *ungranted* locks. Typically the only
> time I care about granted locks is to find out which process is
> keeping my other process getting its lock granted.
>
> merlin
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | John Scalia | 2015-07-31 12:40:33 | Re: Autovacuum behavior |
Previous Message | Om Prakash Jaiswal | 2015-07-31 04:44:27 | Re: Autovacuum behavior |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Albe Laurenz | 2015-07-31 10:05:53 | Re: conn = PQconnectdb(conninfo); |
Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2015-07-31 00:07:01 | Re: Lots of stuck queries after upgrade to 9.4 |