| From: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: jsonb and nested hstore |
| Date: | 2014-03-03 14:57:59 |
| Message-ID: | CAHyXU0xUvwhcf8CWuu2PZ0S_jmN4mZ6VfNM+9fkjasA3sFzNuw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 2014-02-28 14:45:29 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> Well, the jsonb portion of this is arguably the most ready, certainly it's
>> had a lot more on-list review.
>
> Having crossread both patches I tend to agree with this. I don't think
> it's unrealistic to get jsonb committable, but the hstore bits are
> another story.
hm, do you have any specific concerns/objections about hstore?
merlin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2014-03-03 15:00:14 | Re: jsonb and nested hstore |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2014-03-03 14:57:58 | Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation |