Re: jsonb and nested hstore

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: jsonb and nested hstore
Date: 2014-03-03 15:00:14
Message-ID: 20140303150014.GF23352@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2014-03-03 08:57:59 -0600, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > On 2014-02-28 14:45:29 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >> Well, the jsonb portion of this is arguably the most ready, certainly it's
> >> had a lot more on-list review.
> >
> > Having crossread both patches I tend to agree with this. I don't think
> > it's unrealistic to get jsonb committable, but the hstore bits are
> > another story.
>
> hm, do you have any specific concerns/objections about hstore?

I've listed a fair number in various emails, some have been addressed
since I think. But just take a look at the patch, at least last when I
looked, it was simply far from ready. And it's quite a bit of code, so
it's not something that can be addressed within 5min.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2014-03-03 15:05:16 Re: Triggers on foreign tables
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2014-03-03 14:57:59 Re: jsonb and nested hstore