| From: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | google F1 |
| Date: | 2012-05-30 13:57:27 |
| Message-ID: | CAHyXU0xLkwVcTeybHz6iz2urSzBTNOm1Ddi6WJCUMr8z-v1qYA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
So,
If you haven't heard the news yet, google is migrating off MySQL for
adwords. They decided to implement their own system, F1:
It's a distributed SQL system, but they opted not to implement
'eventual consistency' -- which I very much agree with. It's fully
transactional (I think?) and trades transaction latency for the
sharding capabilities. It's an interesting take: how does it compare
to postgres? Does it truly scale?
merlin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bart Lateur | 2012-05-30 15:25:11 | Postgres no longer starts |
| Previous Message | Raghavendra | 2012-05-30 12:45:02 | Re: Updateable Views or Synonyms. |