From: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jan Otto <asche(at)me(dot)com> |
Cc: | postgres performance list <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Repeat execution of stable expressions |
Date: | 2012-03-06 19:29:16 |
Message-ID: | CAHyXU0wpNRmSMUCu_s0=4GnN25UXt5nKhdHGsLjqgNnoy1L9rA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Jan Otto <asche(at)me(dot)com> wrote:
> hi,
>
>> I've complained many times that
>> select (f()).*;
>>
>> will execute f() once for each returned field of f() since the server
>> essentially expands that into:
>>
>> select f().a, f().b;
>>
>> try it yourself, see:
>> create function f(a out text, b out text) returns record as $$
>> begin
>> perform pg_sleep(1);
>> a := 'a'; b := 'b'; end;
>> $$ language plpgsql immutable;
>
>
> i ran into this regularly too. when f() is expensive then i try to rewrite the query so that the
> function only get called once per row.
>
> # explain analyze select (f()).*;
> QUERY PLAN
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Result (cost=0.00..0.51 rows=1 width=0) (actual time=2001.116..2001.117 rows=1 loops=1)
> Total runtime: 2001.123 ms
>
> # explain analyze select f.* from f() as f;
> QUERY PLAN
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Function Scan on f (cost=0.25..0.26 rows=1 width=64) (actual time=1000.928..1000.928 rows=1 loops=1)
> Total runtime: 1000.937 ms
yeah -- that's pretty neat, but doesn't seem fit a lot of the cases I
bump into. In particular, when stuffing composite types in the field
list. You need the type to come back as a scalar so you can expand it
a wrapper (especially when layering views).
merlin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Steve Crawford | 2012-03-07 00:32:30 | Re: Advice sought : new database server |
Previous Message | Jan Otto | 2012-03-06 16:21:45 | Re: Repeat execution of stable expressions |