From: | Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Friedl <linux(at)nicce(dot)at> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Advice sought : new database server |
Date: | 2012-03-07 00:32:30 |
Message-ID: | 4F56AC9E.1090500@pinpointresearch.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 03/04/2012 03:50 AM, Michael Friedl wrote:
> Hey!
>
> On 04.03.2012 10:58, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
>> 1U chassis with 8 2.5" disk bays
>> 2x Intel Xeon E5630 Quad-Core / 4x 2.53GHz / 12MB cache
>> 8 channel Areca ARC-1880i (PCI Express x8 card)
>> presumably with BBU (can't see it listed at present)
>> 2 x 300GB SAS 2.5" disks for operating system
>> (Possibly also 300GB SATA VelociRaptor/10K RPM/32MB cache
>> RAID 1
>> 4 x 300GB SAS 2.5" storage disks
>> RAID 10
>> 48.0GB DDR3 1333MHz registered ECC (12x 4.0GB modules)
>>
> Sorry, no answer for your question and a bit offtopic.
>
>
> Why do you take SAS disks for the OS and not much cheaper SATA ones?
>
>
>
Here's Intel's (very general) take. Your OS disks may not justify SAS on
performance alone but other aspects may sway you.
http://www.intel.com/support/motherboards/server/sb/CS-031831.htm
Cheers,
Steve
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2012-03-07 00:36:53 | Re: SSD and RAID |
Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2012-03-06 19:29:16 | Re: Repeat execution of stable expressions |