From: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | markokr(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: Speed dblink using alternate libpq tuple storage |
Date: | 2012-01-27 15:35:04 |
Message-ID: | CAHyXU0wYA6A0+K=iH2-oX+6Q20TFqhk6o7dOrurEEOY=5iftLg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 2:57 AM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
<horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> Hello, This is a new version of the patch formerly known as
> 'alternative storage for libpq'.
I took a quick look at the patch and the docs. Looks good and agree
with rationale and implementation. I see you covered the pqsetvalue
case which is nice. I expect libpq C api clients coded for
performance will immediately gravitate to this api.
> - The meaning of PGresAttValue is changed. The field 'value' now
> contains a value withOUT terminating zero. This change seems to
> have no effect on any other portion within the whole source
> tree of postgresql from what I've seen.
This is a minor point of concern. This function was exposed to
support libpqtypes (which your stuff compliments very nicely by the
way) and I quickly confirmed removal of the null terminator didn't
cause any problems there. I doubt anyone else is inspecting the
structure directly (also searched the archives and didn't find
anything).
This needs to be advertised very loudly in the docs -- I understand
why this was done but it's a pretty big change in the way the api
works.
merlin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marko Kreen | 2012-01-27 15:42:14 | Re: Speed dblink using alternate libpq tuple storage |
Previous Message | Marti Raudsepp | 2012-01-27 14:53:09 | Re: Caching for stable expressions with constant arguments v6 |